Wenn du Tiger vs Bear magst, könnte dir das auch gefallen: Guns N' Roses. Spielen. Cashanova. Spielen. Super Lucky Frog. Spielen. 37,€. Tiger vs Bear. Bereiten Sie sich auf das ultimative Kräftemessen aller Zeiten vor: Tiger gegen Bär! Wer gewinnt? Kostenfrei spielen Jetzt spielen Sie haben. Vielen Dank, dass Sie eGame Casino heruntergeladen haben! Wenn Ihr Download noch nicht gestartet ist, bitte hier klicken, um die Kasino-Software. Jester's Jackpot Rated 4. Er hat die Arme verschränkt und blickt nach rechts. Hanzos Dojo Rated 3. Magic Portals Rated 4. Emerald Eyes Rated 3. Gypsy Riches Rated 3. Sphinx 3D Rated 4. Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Samba Sunset Rated 4. Kawaii Kitty Rated 3. One book that made you laugh? SlotRank für Tiger vs Bear für. Als weiteres Sondersymbol muss unbedingt der Scatter genannt werden, welcher als Logo des Spiels auftritt. Dalai Panda Rated 3. The bear, to take down these large foes, commonly uses its long forearms to deliver crushing blows to the back or limbs of its prey, crippling it. Held in awe by Native American Indians, classic characters in tiger vs bear, feared, trapped, hunted, displayed in zoos and made to perform in circuses, the bear has marcelo melo had nba tipps heute complicated relationship with humans. Lol a black bear from a southern climate. Therefore, the tiger has more chances of winning. But Iap, I just wanted to tell you that while it would be very difficult, a full grown male lion in his physical prime does have the potential to take down a full manchester united anzug moose. The tiger is faster, more agile, and has sharper teeth and claws. Cougars weapons are smaller than jaguars. Siberian tigers hunt, kill and fight off Kamchatka bears. The tiger is no way stronger than the bear think about it while the cat might just might be stronger than a small out of shape bear but a bear in its prime will be stronger than the tiger at its prime. Bengal tigers can only kill small baby elephants. And lions only dominate tigers sculpturally. You are so pig-ignorant. Your second video mainly featured small lionesses. Grizzly Bears are long-living animal by nature. Mountain lions are on the record as excalibur casino las vegas this to bears, so tiger vs bear massive Amur certainly would do it too, but in an even more savagely effective manner.
I am not sure why you said that. We can also see the insane strength of polar bears in that they are able to just drag walruses around with ease. Polar bears possess enough power to tear through thick layers of tough blubber.
Tigers do not have thick layers of blubber to protect them, a single decent blow from the bear could kill the tiger. Polar bears often fight each other and so are used to taking more damage than the tiger could output.
The bear is bigger, stronger and more durable. I read somewhere that back in the good old circus days, they used to make Black Bears fight Lions all the time.
I think the tiger is a better predator, fighter, in general, but the polar bear is just too big, and too powerful. I know I read about how in the frontier days of America, they had Grizzly vs Bull fights sometimes 2 bulls to make it closer since the Grizzlys almost always won.
Log in or sign up in seconds. Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. General Rules - Wiki Be nice. Disruptive gimmick accounts will be first warned then removed.
Post Rules Overly broad, vague or opinion-reliant posts. Posts with no details or specifications whatsoever. Distasteful posts for the sake of being "edgy" Posts with a clear political or social agenda.
Users may not make more than 5 Posts per day. Comments consisting of a single image or gif to provoke drama or as a non-responsive reply to the thread As with posts, the comments are not a place to promote a political or social agenda.
Spoiler Tag Spoilers -: Text Text Text - Mouse over the black bar to see the spoiler text. Mobile-Friendly Spoilers - How to input: Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet.
Become a Redditor and subscribe to one of thousands of communities. Full grown 11 ft pound male siberian tiger. Full grown 8 ft 1, pound male polar bear.
Battle takes place in a snowy open field. Fight to the death. Want to add to the discussion? A polar bear is a whole different beast.
CGI replicas and models were used to collect data such as strength, bite force, etc. Then, in a virtual arena, a brief computer-animated fight scene reveals the results.
Since the fights are created artificially, results in real life may vary. Each episode of Animal Face-Off is one hour long, with the exception of the 12th episode, which is two hours long.
They can also be rented from the Netflix DVD service. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Discovery Channel original programming.
Boston Stunt Junkies —07 Man vs. Toughest Race on Earth Prototype This! Retrieved from " https: Articles needing additional references from December All articles needing additional references.
Andrew Waterworth Michael Stedman. Great White Shark ". A female great white shark is roaming close to shore , looking for food ; a saltwater crocodile swims nearby, looking for a new territory.
The great white hits the crocodile with the bump-and-bite technique. The shark swims off and makes a wide turn for a full-on assault; all of a sudden, the crocodile gets the first bite on her pectoral fin.
Despite the injury, the great white is still strong. This time, the shark cannot fight back; the crocodile attempts another death roll.
After that, they both sink. Running out of air, the crocodile breaks the death roll and heads straight to the surface. Southern White Rhinoceros ".
In the African Serengeti, a southern white rhinoceros has left its mud hole and is looking for somewhere to feed, nearby, an African savanna elephant is roaming around, also seeking good grazing.
The rhino begin grazing but suddenly feels the ground shaking, and turns to see the elephant. Due to its poor eyesight, the ill-tempered rhinoceros sees him as a rival and prepares to charge.
The elephant responds to the challenge with a loud trumpet, but the relatively smaller animal is not hesitant to charge and makes its move, but the much smarter elephant anticipates the attack by charging too and dodging.
The white rhinoceros then tries an agile headbutt, but the elephant proves better with his seven-foot tusks.
Sure enough, the elephant turns his rival around and stabs it twice with his tusks breaking one in the process that gets stuck in the rhinoceros.
She educates them about what plants are good to eat and where to find them. By the time a juvenile bear leaves its mother, it knows what plant foods are available at each time of the season, and what habitats are likely to have those foods over a very large area.
That knowledge serves them well as they move into new areas, learning and remembering where new food sources are found in a new environment.
This knowledge is also critical to finding food when food sources change drastically from year to year depending upon weather and climate.
Zookeepers and animal trainers consider the bears intelligence to be greater than dogs. That puts them in the upper percentile of higher primates.
They blow lions and tigers out of the water in that category,. James, You continue to dig a deeper hole. I still have more ammo to bury you.
Fuck with the bull and you get the horns. There you have it. Omnivores are smarter than carnivores and herbivores.
Looks like another category the feline loses in. You think a male lion alone can beat an elephant! Lions are a whole level lower, maybe at the jaguars level, even a bit lower maybe.
How did you write a long comment? By the way, tigers are much smarter than bears. They simply have developed a hunting technique that is just too complicated for bears.
Hell, a bear could beat a tiger. I just think the Siberian tiger has more advantages. Thank you for putting up a good debate, unlike James.
I think rob knows that tigers naturally see bears as prey, but prefers trolling.. Are you a scientist? You are the only person here who says that.
Yeah, well the Siberian tiger is You really are giving the weakest argument here. If you actually read — what I wrote..
Apart from the jaguar being a scaled down version, of course. You have seen numerous videos showing lions hunting elephants..
I have also posted real wildlife video of male lions hunting.. Actually kid, its pretty funny when even your mentor in trolling, rob..
Fact is, tiger does naturally prey on bear.. Yeah, the jaguar does get beat by lion and tiger. But tiger beats lion.
I have listed countless facts why the lion would win. Why do you keep going on about irrelevant stuff, which you just made up?
Seems likely, you maybe have mental development deficiencies, like rob, huh kid.. Tiger hunts bear, its a natural fact..
I know tigers hunt bears. I have agreed with you for this fight on this thread. However, the tiger wins against lion.
Looks like you were making stuff up, man. But it does happen. Loo up lion vs tiger national geographic. No, its not there.
No, its not there, either, — is it kid.. I see that you, are even more insane then usual. Therefore, I am not listening to a word you say.
Are you an idiot or a flamer? I thing that the grizzly has the advantage because the have huge claws and powerful paws they have been known to break the backs of wolves and black Bears with one swipe.
I read a few people mention that tigers are used to hunting prey larger than the grizzly. Do any of you know just how large a full grown moose is?
And something like ft tall. You also compare the grizzly apparently on the same scale as the brown bear.
The grizzly although a relative to the brown bear is much fiercer and larger. When you see a brown bear in the woods, you just keep an eye on them.
If you see a grizzly in the woods, you keep a gun on him. Seems like a very biased article with no real facts from actual encounters. Back in roman era, exotic beast were pitted against each other for betting and show purpose.
They fed mostly on the great herds bufalo, now which are few. An Alaskan biologist from Montana told me these were the largest of the North American bears, including the Polar Bear.
In the Time-Life leather-bound books about the old west, one them stated death matches were held between plains grizzly bears vs lions and tigers for amusement and gambling.
The matches were held in either pits or cages. In all cases stated in the book, the plains grizzly won…in less than 60 seconds. The lions and tigers had no chance to stalk or ambush.
It was one on one, face to face, no chance to run. The Plains Grizzlies were like modern day MMA fighters on high protein diets all packed with muscle and fast.
James, man you are a feline fanboy; that too a very hardcore one. You are trying to make big cats sound like they are some kind of unbeatable killing machines, which was destined to kill.
Just remember they too have their limits and tendencies, for e. Oh, that idiot is a disgrace to animal research. Man, I thought you were long gone!
In fact, there is no need.. You can see for yourself on the wildlife videos, for such a masterly lion is truly.. Big cats are pretty lit, but to think they can take out elephants like James says… B.
A tiger wins against both lion and bear. In fact, their is no need either to imagine what a Grizzly bear can do. Certainly such a lardy layer is of negative value in a combat with a true killer..
Plus, any bear that has only ever felt the bite of his own kind — at worst.. The shit one comes across while drinking, the answer is one all over the net there are plenty of cage matches sadly enough where bears are put to fight big cats including tigers.
I have read that Siberian tigers prey on brown bears, but of course these are smaller than them not the really large ones.
If you really think a tiger would win, I say, search the web for these clips. For anyone who loves an animal, it is easy to see why people are so passionate on both sides but everything I saw in the unnatural habitat of a cage match showed a bear winning against lions, tigers, and even other bears — oh my.
I aint afraid to post the appropos vid-link.. Fact is, a prime boss big panthera — rips fat-as brownie..
Sorry about that vid-link.. You are the Idiot Tony. I can only hope you gain wisdom as you get older. You really need to open your mind young man.
He meant Kodiak bears, as in grizzly bears, which are the same animal dumbass. I still see you two idiots trying to debate facts.
I gave up arguing with idiots like you and James. They take you down to their level and beat you with experience. They are only slightly bigger on average.
Siberian tigers hunt, kill and fight off Kamchatka bears. Put that together, idiot. Your sticky dumpster-derived bear crap stinks..
They do not have the same power A brown bear has significantly more swiping force than a S-Tiger. Bears are more fierce and has more weight.
If they both stand on their hind legs head on the bear will trample the tiger. BB, Do some research. Lay off the LSD. A Tigers best chance is when a bear is hibernating or total surprise.
Panthera bite is like-wise, that of a true killer-carnivore, not a garbage eater.. Lol a black bear from a southern climate.
They are small and weak. Tigers have a far better chance against a huge grizzly or Kodiak than a flea bitten lion. Or — if you do want to learn, then actually review the science, as in relevant published papers, via google scholar, instead.
James, wow, does no amount of evidence convince you? Most written accounts show tigers are greater than lions and I provided yet another source.
Flea bitten tick infested lions depend on a pride to survive. They must hunt with numbers because alone they seldom survive for too long.
Bears and Tigers do it solo. Meaning you ignore — most — fact-checked evidence, because the facts — upset your over-valued fantasies..
Its a natural fact kid, learn to accept it. James, every time you insult me or Gary, you have to realize you still are giving no evidence to prove your point.
You simply dance around the subject. You just insult me and Gary seven eighths of the time, and the other one eighth, you just states your hopeless opinion.
Sad that my name Jack starts with the same letter as yours. I wish my name was Tony. There you go again. Yeah, I know tiger beats bear.
I use reliable sources, not garbage comments which eighty percent of the people are with me on the lion vs tiger thing.
All that proves is that bulk idiots abound — on sites like this. Dude, eighty percent of the people there have common sense! And look at me with a straight face, and say National Geographic is a garbage resource.
People like you, are idiots! You think a lion alone will take down a fully grown elephant. Your so stupid, James.
You think everyone except for you and a few other fanboys are idiots. Wake up, you stupid idiot! The useless drivel that he is constantly spouting out is sheer bias.
He never stated actual fact and all the links he provides are bogus. Lions have only one advantage and that is a mane to protect them from a neck bite.
Otherwise the Tiger has every physical advantage. Teeth, claws, strength, bite force to that of a Lion. He just needs to get over it.
Furthermore you must have struggled in math. Nowhere do I say a Tiger would typically defeat a grizzly or polar bear.
I do however believe all 3 would dispatch a flea bitten lion the majority of the time. Opinions are only as good as the facts which support them, kid.
Grizzly bear is an dangerous adversary even for a male Tiger. Thats not quite fair,how about a siberian tiger the largest cat on the earth.
But against the largest bear on earth the kodiak brown bear,is all most twice as big and fearsest,as alion or tiger. Brown bear has the advantage unless a lucky kill by the line.
I am not referring to the grizzly bear but the big brown bear in Alaska that can go to pounds and over 11 feet tall.
It would not be a contest if they were both alert the bear is packed with dense fat and muscle. James W, Just like African lion vs Grizzly bear, this fight can go either way.
The bear has the strength advantage, while the tiger has the speed and agility advantage. For a human to be packed with dense fat is a bad thing.
However, bears are different. They can hunt large prey like moose and bison. Their bellies are the only parts which are fat. Their back, legs, and arms are muscle.
That is pure muscle, which gives them strong forearms. James W, Please do some research. You will learn that that hump, is actually muscle — that is why bears have strong forearms.
Do some research about the fat protecting the bears to. Also, big cats are better hunters, but when it comes to fighting, both bears and big cats are equally matched with a slight edge to the bear.
The key to victory for the tiger are its hind legs. When the two engage the hind legs with their long claws would seriously damage the torso of the bear.
So many of these comments are ridiculous, saying tigers win because they have been known to hunt brown bears. Grizzlies are much heavier than tigers, and have much, much, much thicker hides and layers of fat.
Tigers are designed to pierce through thinner hides and hunt with surprise attacks. There is no difference between a grizzly bear and a brown bear.
How can you be such a fool? Mountain lions are on the record as doing this to bears, so a massive Amur certainly would do it too, but in an even more savagely effective manner..
One scientific explanation for this that I read is that fat in the central area of your body provides more kinetic energy to the force of your arms.
You can be fat due to lack of exercise, or you can be fat just by nature but actually very physically fit. Bears are fat by nature: I think a big brown bear would win vs tiger mostly due to bone mass.
The reason we may think that tigers supposedly hunt bears is that its always the tiger that makes the choice to attack a bear.
And what tiger would ever try significantly risk his life? So the tigers always attack the weaker bears, and also tigers hunt in packs.
This is why momma bears are so protective of their cubs. Fart, Tyson in his prime was a lean, mean KO machine!
No fat-pad paunch on him then, nor on any real champ. Fact is, some tigers do hunt bears, despite being naturally risk-averse. You are right, Tyson in his prime was lean and muscular.
Apu the lying, cheating, scamming, sociopath.. A tiger could never get to any vital organs on a bear that size with all that fur and fat. The bear is way tougher and far more durable.
Tigers have a hard time fighting with some of the smallest bears in the world which are sloth bears. Then there are Kodiak grizzlies which get up to pounds and polar bears too.
Both way more powerful than a tiger. The fight can go either way. The bear is stronger, but the tiger is faster and more agile.
You seriously need to stop being biased. James W, Honestly, both pantherines are pretty much equal when it boils down to evolutionary adaptations — but if you examine the anatomy of both cats, you will realize that the tiger has a slight edge.
This larger cranial volume also gives the tiger stronger jaws than the lion, which is yet, another advantage in combat.
Not to mention that while lions fight a lot, tigers also have their fair share of fighting experience — tigers often have to fight to death in order win the heart of a female or to protect their territory.
That being said, the lion is no slouch in any of the departments where the tiger gets the upper hand or, shall I say, paw: The tiger, on the other hand, has black stripes, which allows it to camaflouge itself while hunting.
The lion is able to wrestle large prey like Cape Buffalo, but it takes more time and effort. Also, check this link out: It says that before poaching and habitat destruction, Bengal tigers used to grow OVER pounds — almost twice the size of an African lion!
AP, can you provide evidenc for your claims? AFAIK, lion hunts are the most successful of the big cats, due to their socially cooperative approach, which enables them to bring down even mega-fauna prey species..
A Polar Bear vs. A Tiger vs Grizzly think about everything the bears has make sure to calculate in the weakness do the same with the Tiger.
Tiger one shot slow it down 5 shots thing would be limbing away, and 10 shots time for Tiger soup. A one shot rifle vs bear with surprise 1 mile away not nice knowing you.
The Siberian Tiger for being close to the same size as a grizzly. Is much more agile, quicker and stronger. It will be behind the Grizzly and on its back before it even knows what happened.
If the bear can deliver one blow of front feet towards the tigers head…its done! Go on Youtube and check out that video of a pound mother sloth bear who protects her cub from an adult tiger.
I would give it for the Tiger. The tiger would be powerful enough to wrestle the Grizzly to the ground and go for a neck bite.
To sum everything up, if the tiger manages to wrestle a Grizzly or a Kodiak bear to the ground and get a neck bite, it would win. This is the expertise a skilled full-time killer — puts to work, to his decided advantage.
James W, Yes, I have done anatomical study. Check this link out: Indeed, the tiger is a far better killer than the bear. James W, Really man?
How I am arrogant? How is that arrogant? I am not giving a tiger any tips — I am just stating the most realistic way a tiger could kill a bear.
But the two guys are practically the same except for the fact that one is stronger. But a tiger and a bear are completely different animals. They have different body structures.
Plus, the hump on their back is pure muscle — that gives them powerful forearms. But in overall strength, the bear takes the cake by a slight margin.
Do try to grasp some reality, boy.. But when taking on larger and stronger prey, they certainly use their paws — google it. Plus, killing a pound muscle bound moose with one paw swipe takes a lot of strength — that is the point.
It does not matter how the muscle is developed. As long as the bear is strong enough to fight the tiger — that is all that matters. Jeeze… Did I say that fat is muscle?!
Nature does not give things without reason. If you imagine you do.. Do you, even in your most lurid dream of superstitions..
If such a rare event.. The vid shows a bear with a calf kill.. But Mooses antlers can also meausure up to 6ft. When tigers are hunting, they will just go for the neck.
And the bear, as mentioned earlier, is used to this also. Tigers have a vast range of skilled options to employ when confronting many different animals..
You seem to forget that the most ferocious opponent a male tiger must defeat.. Some tigers choose to prey on bears.. No bear would be tolerated in his hunting grounds..
In a hunt, tigers will use a variety of skills indeed, but like most big cats except the jaguar they will first go for the neck.
Just like a male tiger must defend his territory from another male tiger, a male grizzly must do the same also. Both are very territorial animals, in case you did not know….
You never learn, do you? Fights between big cats are very vicious, however, to say that fights between bears are pathetic, is frankly, ludicrous.
Go on Youtube and see fights between male grizzlys — they are hella violent. Wait, why are you mentioning lions, this is a Grizzly bear vs Siberian tiger thread?
Just like lions assert their dominance, tigers and bears do the same. In fact, sometimes tigers and bears will go out and also kill other animals because they either want to invade their territory, or they are threatening their cubs.
APey, ok, I can see you are escalating.. Just let me know when you are done weeping about your precious lion… than we can have an adult like debate… LMFAO.
Not that he could actually learn anything.. Small in land grizzly bears in Montana have been studied and have been scientifically proven to through pound dumpsters like beach balls.
I have family who live in grizzly country and one of there friends shot a grizzly bear point blank with a shotgun and lived the friend escaped though while the bear was stunned from the shot.
Big cats do of course.. Just look it up or are you too lazy you ass wipe. The legs of the moose are even bigger than the lion itself. Those heads have antlers that are 6ft long so chill a moose can kill a lion but lions can also kill a moose check reports of moose attacks on people they are pretty hard core.
He is truly an idiot. But Iap, I just wanted to tell you that while it would be very difficult, a full grown male lion in his physical prime does have the potential to take down a full grown moose.
No bear can do.. Black bears also can climb up trees they do it just as fast as your big cats do actually can you provide a source of a lion being a good climber.
But cats, even real big ones.. Iap never denied that lions can climb trees, he just requested that you provided evidence as to how lions are GOOD climbers.
In your first video, the food was not kept to high, thus the lion did not have to really climb. Your second video mainly featured small lionesses.
In the case of the big males, the tree was not to tall either. Lions, tigers, and jaguars are capable of climbing tall trees, but their massive size makes it difficult for them.
Also if you ever realized that when people think of big tough lumberjacks they tend to relate them to big tough grizzlies.
Also grizzlys never need to climb besides when the cubs. A fat-as bear simply cannot climb a pole. Also that burger was at a family reunion in a park and my uncle made burgers but some vegan protesters walked up to us and started freaking out because of how we were having a barbecue.
Hey Lames W, The problem is, Lames W the joker has not provided any links to back his ludicrous claims — thus it is impossible to examine them when they are non-existent… LOL.
What have you provided, Lames W? Wait, I forgot… bullshit. You have provided bullshit… LMAO. Lame-ass Whore, What is that disgusting, rotten thing that died on your neck?
Wait, never mind, it was your head…L. Your lame attempts to cite trash sites.. Accept it and be happy. If you think otherwise, by all means cite some reliable sources or formulate a valid argument.
So he has a spoilt brat tantrum.. I think that the fight is even there are accounts of tigers killing brown bears and brown bears are reported to also kill tigers.
But the tigers only attack small bears or females. But also when there food supply is low Tigers will ambush bears also.
But on a one on one fight I think it leans more towards the bear. If Iap, you are really interested.. Male lions also form coalitions, grouping up cooperatively..
Tigers do not do this, nor do bears.. Iap, FYI, the specific movie.. Where do you get shit like that from? King Kong fiction movies?
Ok James what would win a little ninja or a massive old Norse berserkir. I hope you say the berserkir because they are one of the most bad ass warrior groups of history.
It would also be a hell of a fight to watch. The tiger is faster, more agile, and has sharper teeth and claws. The bear is larger, marginally stronger, and has fur, fat, and loose skin to protect it from life threatening injuries.
Look Lames… if you are depressed, than committing suicide is an option…it will benefit you and the rest of the world…. The only issue with you committing suicide… is….
You are a fucking hypocrite. You scam and you have the balls to call me a scammer? And what evidence do you have that Indians are corrupt?
For shame you deceitful scoundrel, for shame…. Hilarious… So Apey or some other dung-wallah decided to troll and scam… lame… just lame….
I am the real James W. I have admitted that a bear would destroy a tiger. Remember guys, you all know who the real James W.
The one who apologized for his mistakes. No you are retarded. So spare us your ridiculous remarks — you ignorant idiot..
Too bad for your futile fantasies, huh kid.. You are bloody useless. Tigers are larger, heavier, stronger, have more powerful jaws, more intelligent, quicker, more agile, etc.
The tiger is The lion is Furthermore, tigers are So, with strength alone, the tiger will take control of the fight. Add to the fact that tigers are more intelligent fighters and are more aggressive than lions, a lion stands no fucking chance.
You are an idiot. What records Lames, huh? Can you provide some links? Aww…little Lamesey is gonna cry now, L. Lames, Robert gave evidence to support his point of view.
I noticed that you did not respond to that.. Clearly the tiger is more powerful. The tiger has a beautiful orange coat with stripes while lions have ugliesh tannish skin.
He never did that you fucking liar. Rome, India, and California are the only places where wild animals were pitted against each other you retard.
Out of fights, tigers won , while lions won Now GTFO you slimy son of a bitch. Beatty himself admitted that his arena was formed in a manner which would give the lions an advantage in battle.
Beatty also admitted that his lions fought in groups, and ganged up on solo tigers.